'A Newborn King'
- The proper names 'Mary' and 'Jesus'
- Gabriel visits Joseph
- The Virgin Birth as chasm between the Christians and the Jews
- The loss of the Doctrine of Christ and 'Son of God' in the Old Testament
- The dual meaning of 'Emmanuel'
- The setting of the Nativity as the Holy of Holies
- The Ox and the Donkey as a denunciation to the corrupted High Priests
*Some of the points in this episode are derived from the writings of Margaret Barker.
all right in this episode we are going
to cover the crux of the Christmas story
the nativity I want to back up to
Matthew 1 and start off with the end of
the listing of generations that Matthew
gives to Joseph showing that Christ is a
Davidic King through his stepfather
Joseph in 16 it says and Jacob begat
joseph the husband of Mary of whom was
born Jesus who is called Christ now
bring this theme in a couple times here
in this episode and we've done this
often but Joseph Smith here has not just
Mary of whom was born Jesus but Mary of
whom was born Jesus as the prophets have
written who is called Christ I think we
should consider here that not only are
we talking about the prophets who have
all prophesied all prophesied of Jesus
Christ coming into the world the Son of
God but they may have also all
prophesied of Mary and so when we see
here the joseph the husband of Mary of
whom was born Jesus as the prophets have
written i think we should consider that
this is not just the prophets that I've
written about Jesus but the prophets
have Mary written about Mary of whom was
born Jesus who is called Christ so Mary
is a central figure obviously here in
the Nativity and in the birth and
condescension of Jesus Christ the first
stage of his condescension here and by
the way even in the Book of Mormon the
name of Mary the mother of Jesus is
given twice
so Mary may very well have been medium
which means woman may very well have
been given as the name of the mother of
the Savior being born into mortality
that would not be strange given that it
means woman and given that we know that
the name Jesus was prophesied as well as
the name of the Savior so if we go to 18
it says the following now the birth of
Jesus Christ was on this wise when as
his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph
so this was the betrothal be we can call
it an engagement legally they were
actually married at this point but it's
more of a a betrothal and then there's a
waiting period of time before they have
a a feast where they actually would
consummate the marriage so they're
legally bound but the marriage is not
consummated at this point when as his
mother Mary was espoused to Joseph
before they came together this would be
at the feast and the consummation
sheaf she was found with child of the
Holy Ghost now this is important for
Matthew to write about this point one of
the proof texts or many of the proof
texts would be of something written
about a virgin giving birth to the son
of God with the prophets and so in
Judaism if that exists then there has to
be a belief in the Messiah being the Son
of God who would come down to earth
that had been bleached so to speak
throughout the scriptures now we can
find themes of this everywhere in the
Old Testament from the prophets because
that's what they prophesied about but
nothing specific it's not easy to see
because it had been bleached we know
this now there are some many biblical
scholars actually and even some LDS
scholars
they're gonna say that we're just kind
of reading into the Old Testament and
trying to pull a Christian
interpretation that's not true
we're not likening these scriptures unto
us as Christians on some type of a
previous storyline or narrative that was
given in the Old Testament and trying to
change it to make it look like these
prophecies are being fulfilled through a
Christian nativity and birth of Christ
and then atonement of Christ all of the
prophets prophesied of Christ they all
prophesied of his birth or likely all
prophesied of his birth and certainly
all prophesied of him coming into
mortality and taking on the sins of the
world
this was Jehovah that they were talking
about but in the time that Matthew was
written and this may not be written by
Matthew but in the time that this was
written as the Gospel of Matthew there
would have already been a big division
between the converted Christians who
were Jews mostly and the Jews who were
fighting against this new Jewish sect
following the Nazarene or as the Jews
called the Christians the nose-ring
which is an interesting play on words
there perhaps which actually means the
keepers which I would say are the
keepers of the New Covenant the
guardians of the New Covenant not the
Nazarenes but they would have been
saying that Mary was not a virgin right
because if she's a virgin and there's a
miracle birth then that gives credence
to Jesus being the Messiah and the Son
of God so the stories against that would
be that Mary was a harlot that she was
promiscuous there was even one story
going on as a couple centuries later
that she was that she birthed Jesus with
a Roman soldier and so Matthew is going
to be fighting against this
and making sure that there is testimony
that Mary is a virgin and that this is a
miraculous birth so there are strong
political Fiat vehicle elements here in
this newfound competition so to speak
between the Christians and the Jews and
in nineteen it says then Joseph her
husband being a just man and not willing
to make her a public example was minded
to put her away privily now what that
means is under the law of Moses he could
have had her stoned to death as an
adulteress because again even though
it's just a patrol though it is legal
they are legally bound together once
they are as we would look at it as they
are engaged they are legally together
even though they haven't consummated the
marriage but the other option is that
he can divorce her and he can do it
quietly so that he's taking care of her
so to speak remember Mary is probably I
mean early teens
more than likely here so he wants to
protect her and then one night as he's
contemplating this he has a dream or a
vision and Gabriel visits him just like
he had visited Mary and just as he had
visited Zacharias and it says the angel
of the Lord appeared unto Him in a dream
saying Joseph thou son of David fear not
in other words remember who you are your
direct line of David this is showing
it's somewhat like you're going to step
in as a father to the king the Davidic
King who is being born here fear not to
take unto thee Mary thy wife for that
which is conceived in her is of the Holy
Ghost so he has a an assurance a
confirmation that there's no foul play
here and then he says and she shall
bring forth a son and thou shalt call
his name Jesus so we can find in the Old
Testament several places where the
Messiah or a messianic type of a passage
is being
where we're talking about being saved or
the Savior
remember again Jesus basically means
Savior and it says here for he shall
save his people from their sins
so his name will be Jesus for he shall
save his people for from his sin so
Gabriel is giving to Joseph the meaning
behind Jesus which he already knows but
he's saying that's why he's going to be
called Jesus because he is the Savior
and then he makes the clarification here
that is he's not saving him he's not
saving his people from the Romans he's
not saving them even from a corrupted
system of the temple with the Sadducees
and the high priests or from the
oppression of the Pharisees but he's
saving them from their sins and this is
therefore something that has been
corrupted about this messianic figure
that is going to come down it's not a
political figure even though it is
political it is in fact Jehovah it is in
fact God and this whole energy that see
this negative dark energy just seems to
continually push against this idea that
God would lower himself and have that
mercy and love for us to do this and
this is where the Jews had arrived at
this point right and they'd been there
for centuries and it's why Lehi left
Jerusalem it's why he was cast out
because he was preaching about the son
of God so Gabriel makes the
clarification here that this is not a
political Messiah that this is Jesus who
is the savior who will take on the sins
of the world and then Matthew says here
in 22 now all this was done that it
might be fulfilled it's interesting
Matthew loves to go through and talk
about fulfillment of prophecy from the
old testament prophets in fact there i
think there's about 14 different
specific citations to old
Testament prophets in the book of
Matthew and eight of those are actually
from Isaiah of course right the
Messianic prophet but it's important to
understand that here because it says
that it might be fulfilled which was
spoken of the Lord by the Prophet saying
and then he goes on to quote Isaiah well
Isaiah is sometimes called the Prophet
we can see that even in the Book of
Mormon Nephi refers to the Prophet I
think it's through the words of Lehi but
he's talking about Isaiah so we
oftentimes use the term the Prophet and
who do we think of when we say the
Prophet well we have someone in mind -
it's Joseph Smith but interestingly
enough here Joseph Smith actually adds
an S to the end of Prophet and he says
the prophets in other words again
another emphasis that even though these
people are in the minority that believe
that the Messiah is the son of God is
Jehovah all of the prophets have
prophesied of this and that's why we
know that there has been a wiping clean
so to speak of the writings of the of
the prophets and not just once and not
just twice it's over and over again I'm
gonna go into that a little bit more
specifically here in just a bit so he
quotes Isaiah here and he says in 23
behold a virgin shall be with child and
shall bring forth a son and they shall
call his name Emmanuel which being
interpreted is God with us a couple
things that are important on this to
understand again I'm trying to put it a
little bit more context into this whole
Christmas story virgin it is oftentimes
said now from biblical scholars they'll
actually translate virgin here even in
Isaiah as a young woman and why do they
do that it's because in the Masoretic
taxes which is what we have for the Old
Testament which is a text that we don't
even Sui have or from the eighth
ninth century I think after Christ in
other words post Christianity post birth
of Christianity and the term that is
you there is Yama Yama Yama and that can
mean a young woman or a virgin but
here's the thing the Septuagint which
was finalized over a long period of time
but well before the time of Christ was
the translation that was taken from
texts in Hebrew from the prophets and
from the law of Moses from the Torah
the five books of Moses and translated
into Greek in Egypt they were in Egypt
when they did this it's called the
Septuagint because they were probably
looks there were about 70 different
elders or scribes or whatever they were
that went down to Egypt and created this
translation and they hailed it as the
greatest miracle that there was that the
translation was so accurate and they
celebrated it every year they went out
to this island where supposedly the
translators went to create the
Septuagint they went out every year and
had a big feast and called it the
equal of the Hebrew texts well in that
text they used in the place of virgin
what would have been virgin in the older
texts again we don't have those older
texts necessarily but in the place of
that they used the Greek term Parthenos
which does not mean a young woman it is
very specific to a virgin but as
Christianity grew in popularity the
entirety because of this passage and
many others that refer to things that
look more like the Son of God and a
virgin birth the Septuagint eventually
became satanic practically to the Jews
and it was put away with completely in
fact quote on this and I can't remember
where this comes from it might have been
from like I don't remember where it came
from but it's here's the court on the
day of its translation being the
Septuagint was as Grievous for Israel as
the day the golden calf was made for the
Torah could not be adequately translate
right so after Christianity this was
gone it was done with a complete 100
degree reversal on the Septuagint being
held up as near-perfect to being as bad
as the Golden Calf at Sinai and this was
the Bible so to speak this was the Old
Testament that Christianity used it's
what was widespread at that time and it
was in Greek of course so Paul and
others who are out Apollo's who are out
preaching the gospel to Gentiles in the
Greek world this was obviously what they
would be using and Greek was spoken all
over the place including in Palestine
and so a lot of the quotations from the
Old Testament that we have in the New
Testament are quotations that come from
the Septuagint so this was a real a
real dividing line this whole idea of
the virgin at the time of Christ and
after Christ and through the centuries
and it really still is and back to the
name of Jesus real quick remember what
Jesus is and where we get the how we
know it is Savior more or less I mean
but it's Jesus is really Joshua right so
just like Joshua that fit the Battle of
Jericho the successor to Moses it's the
same name so in Hebrew Anglicize
transliterated it is it is Joshua which
in Hebrew is actually Yeshua so that's
what Mary would have called her baby she
would have called him Yeshua so this is
prophecy that even though it's not
exactly the way it should be in the
Septuagint by now because back in the
time of Lehi there were massive changes
in the theology what Christ was largely
removed not completely still find
different things like the virgin birth
but a lot of it was removed but there
was a tradition right there was peep
there were people holding on to the
older way
to the time of Lehi and before that nu
of God coming down being born to Mary
and taking on the sins of the world it
was not the majority it was not the
popular theology at the time but looking
at different sects outside of the
Pharisees and the Sadducees you can look
at the Essenes and the therapeutic and
perhaps others that we don't know of
that had different traditions and they
had different beliefs and they were
expecting different things everyone knew
that especially with the prophecy of
Daniel that this was about the time that
the Messiah was going to be born but the
idea of what the Messiah was is vastly
different throughout most of Judaism
especially those in power they want a
political Messiah they want to be the
shackles removed from the rule of Herod
and from Caesar while others probably
Joseph and Mary and Zacharias and
Elizabeth and those around them and a
network of these people throughout all
the towns probably are looking for the
savior of the world and so Isaiah's
words here and shall bring forth a son
and they shall call his name Emmanuel
well it's in mono means with us and El
is God so it's God with us or God in the
midst of us there's two ways of looking
at this that I think offers some rich
context as to why Matthew here is
quoting what Isaiah said about this here
and I think it both is centered in that
both these things are centered in the
temple and the drama and story that the
temple portrays and has portrayed at
least in the time of the temple of
Solomon about the Son of God coming down
to earth God with us there's two ways of
looking at that well one is it's God
with us in other words he's going to
become one of us he's going to be born
of a woman and enter into mortality like
us
he's going to lower himself from on high
to our state the other way to look at
this is that this is the Davidic King
right in the temple drama the Davidic
King would act as Jehovah and so in
other words not as Jehovah necessarily
but as the Davidic King he was a manual
because he was acting as God who is with
us every day right his role was to act
as Jehovah that was one of his drama
roles in that temple drama and so the
Davidic King is a symbol therefore of
Jehovah and of a man well as God
being here with us as the king so again
this is referring back to very rich and
ancient traditions and then we're told
that Joseph wakes from this dream he
takes Mary to himself probably marries
her early they don't wait around much
longer and then doesn't know her or does
not have relationships with her until
after Christ is born and by the way in
the last verse here in Matthew 1 it says
and knew her not till she had brought
forth her firstborn son
that's another reference to the Davidic
King that was one of the titles that the
Davidic King would have is the firstborn
and he called his name Jesus just as was
prophesied and now we go over to Luke 2
we're a little bit more familiar with
Luke 2 than we are with Matthew 1 and
here we go over the actual Nativity and
it opens up interestingly it says and it
came to pass in those days that there
went out a decree from Caesar Augustus
that all the world should be taxed and
this taxing was first made when
Quirinius was governor of Syria that's
impossible that's these are inspired
writers but they're not historians and
there wasn't a tax that was called out
at this time but there was a
census that was called out by Sentia
saturninus more or less something like
that and that was between the years of 9
and 6 BC and this would have been again
while Mary was pregnant but Jesus is not
born yet and so Joseph takes Mary with
him and they travel from Beth from
Nazareth which is where Mary at least is
could be that Joseph was actually from
the land of Bethlehem somewhere around
there that is his home so to speak from
his lineage and there are other stories
where Joseph actually meets Mary in the
temple but he takes Mary from Nazareth
down to Bethlehem and this census could
be significant as far as fulfilling
prophecy and that's maybe why Luke here
is mentioning this one of the early
Christian fathers who savea's in quoting
Origen a later father the Christian
father said that there was another Greek
translation what which said the
following of this is of psalm eighty
seven or eighty eighty seven eighty
seven five I think in the census of the
peoples this one will be born there and
so this is something that is a reference
back to a previous prophecy and this is
something we always ought to look at in
authorship in the scriptures is that
what are they trying to do especially in
the Gospels they are trying to show that
Jesus is who he says he is that he is
the Savior
that he is the Messiah but not only are
they doing that not only are they trying
to convince and bear testimony of that
they're trying to bring in a lost
theology right think about the
incredibly difficult job that they have
because they're trying to convince
everybody else that they're converting
all the Jews anyway that they are lost
it's not just hey this is the Messiah
Jesus it's everything that you have
learned about their not being a son of
God and only how
in Jehovah as the a pure
monotheism pure monotheists he's wrong
and these things that we read in Isaiah
and Zechariah and in Malachi and
throughout the prophets especially and
Moses in the Torah there was a
different tradition that has been
removed that's what they would have been
telling them and that's what we learned
directly from Joseph Smith and from the
Book of Mormon what a vast difference
there is 600 years before Christ is born
in the preaching of Jesus Christ in
starting right in the book of Nephi in
1st and 2nd Nephi and throughout the
entire Book of Mormon
using the name Jesus and Christ and the
titles of son of God they knew that the
Messiah would be the son of God there
was no doubt to them and that's what
they it's a whole reason they broke off
from Jerusalem and the whole reason that
they kept the record of the Book of
Mormon is because what was lost to
everybody else to the majority of the
people in Jerusalem at Lehigh's time was
the doctrine of Christ and so when the
Babylonians conquered Jerusalem and
razed Jerusalem completely took that
took down the temple everything in about
587 BC so about 10 years 10 11 years
after Lehi leaves Jerusalem and the Jews
are carried away not all of them just a
portion of them are taken away but it's
the elites it's the people in power that
are taken from the Kings court and the
wealthy are taken with a lot of people
that are left behind that are peasants
and the temple is destroyed there's
no more Davidic Kings what happens to
the temple drum at that time how long
does that last that had probably already
been changed if not removed and then
they come back build the second temple
hair it takes that over and makes it
even larger and it's not built on the
doctrine of Christ and so here the
Gospels are trying to say
hey this isn't just the Messiah but look
this doctrine the most crucial
doctrine of our gospel of Abraham of
Adam of Moses of everybody has been
about Jesus Christ has been about the
Son of God and then in verse 7 we get
some specifics about very few but we get
a few specifics that we can glean a lot
of information from remember how Matthew
is going to be writing this he's writing
this to restore tradition he's writing
this to restore doctrine it says here in
verse 6 first and so it was that while
they were there the days were
accomplished that she should be
delivered so Christ was going to be born
there in Bethlehem and she brought forth
her firstborn son again a Davidic title
here and wrapped him in swaddling
clothes now why mention that Matthew is
setting up a scene here now the
swaddling clothes were bands of linen
what did the high priest wear when he
after he was with the day of atonement
when he would sacrifice the ball and the
goat he would then change and he would
go into All Whites and into linen and
then he would go into the holy of
holies what we're gonna see here in not
the stable but in the nativity scene
here is a recreation of the holy of
holies so this is an important thing to
say if you're setting up this stage here
he's basically wrapped in these
swaddling clothes this white linen that
is going to be looked at as high
priestly garb
it's the robes of the high priest who
would go in on the day of atonement into
the Holy of Holies in an early Christian
wisdom text that's called the Epistle of
the Apostles this is in doctrine this
isn't part of the Canon but it gives you
an idea of what the early Christians
were thinking here it says that the Lord
was robed in wisdom this would be also a
reference to
the Melchizedek Priesthood and to marry
even as wisdom and here wisdom the
mother gives to her son a high priestly
garment that is woven from every wisdom
right so this is kind of these
traditions that are being brought
together here and Matthew is laying out
this scene and setting the stage for us
it's a temple scene or we can certainly
look at it that way but it sure seems
that way to me and I think that's what
Matthew is doing here and then she laid
him in a manger
now we think about this and one thing we
always think about with this scene is
that it's very humble and that's very
true and that's an important point right
now it's not a stable that there in
unlikely there's no word stable anywhere
in the scriptures what they're likely in
around the land of Bethlehem there
are numerous caves and this is something
that would be used for shelter for the
animals oftentimes and for people
there's not a lot of wood around at all
in fact when we talk about Joseph being
a carpenter it's probably not a
carpenter of wood as we would think it's
probably the term used for carpenter is
more someone who's skilled with a
certain material and that material is
probably stone there's an abundance of
stone in the areas of Jerusalem and
Bethlehem and Galilee but there's not an
abundance of wood so it's unlikely that
Joseph was a carpenter of wood and it's
unlikely that there would be much if any
wood at all in the nativity scene this
is inside of a cave more than likely and
the manger would not be anything built
with wood and it wouldn't have straw
likely in it they didn't need that this
was a warm climate they didn't need to
store it unless they had it in from the
rain but the manger would be more of
something made for drinking actually in
most cases and it would be made of stone
not of wood so we can imagine why is he
saying laying in a manger well
he's got to be slaying or sitting he
can't set yet but he's got to be on
something why because he's the king
because he needs a throne so here we
have his clothing his high priestly
clothing his royal clothing and here we
have his throne that's what he's trying
to set up here and the reason that they
are in this place is because there was
no room for them in the inn now we think
of one in Joseph Smith actually inserts
an S at the end of this so there was no
room in the ends anywhere now something
that is not here in the scripture but
that is part of Christian tradition are
the two animals that we oftentimes see
in early Christian paintings and that is
the ox and the donkey now why are those
two animals there for the most part we
have a tradition that says that the ox
is a clean animal for the most part the
interpretation of that is that the Ox is
a clean animal that would represent the
Jews and Israel and the donkey is an
unclean animal and it represents the
Gentiles and there's probably a lot of
truth to that
but in the earliest paintings typically
that you see those two animals in the
nativity scene you see them on either
side of the manger and so even though
Matthew doesn't have it mentioned here
or the transcripts that we have don't
have that listed in their Christian
tradition knew that Jesus in linen on
the manger was laying there between two
beasts now think of the Ark of the
Covenant and the mercy seat the two
cherubim we all often think of just
angels that are cherubim with the
cherubim are beasts and they're
described oftentimes in the Old
Testament with different parts of
different animals it's all symbolism of
course
but again that is part of the Holy of
Holies this is a scene of the new
Melchizedek right the new milk is Vic
the new Davidic King the new High Priest
coming into the world and sitting on the
throne or laying on the throne in the
Holy of Holies and there's even more to
the story of the beast that's very
interesting here I mean quote something
has to do with wordplay
it was oftentimes throughout the writing
of the Jews they would use wordplay and
they would do that oftentimes showing
the good side of something and then
almost like this mirror or slightly
different word that meant something
negative so there would be a positive
and there be a negative that would be
used and both would be implied with the
single word or with the phrase and if
again we go back to fulfilling prophecy
here with these two beasts and
especially in Isaiah we can go right to
the beginning of Isaiah in chapter 1
verse 3 and we get the Ox knows its
owner and the donkey it's masters
masters feeding trough but Israel does
not know my people do not understand
well what could be done here is that
this might be being used as a text as a
fulfillment of prophecy that Israel that
Judah that the priests especially the
high priests those that run the temple
in the time of Christ know Anna's and
Caiaphas and the Sadducees that they do
not know Christ they don't even believe
in the Son of God because word play
comes into play here with Isaiah 1:3 the
Ox in Hebrew is Shore
and it knows its owner connais this is
very similar to Prince the Tsar that
would be the son of the king so you have
oxes Shore and Prince is char and owner
can also be beget
so the Prince knows his begetter that
would be the ox and the ass
the amore is a lot like a word for
priests we usually use the term
Cohen for priests but another word for
priests is calm air so how more calm air
the K and the H they're very
similar in Hebrew and this was used all
the time as something that would be
mocking someone right as a bad priest
they would be a an ass right there would
be a more and they we see that term in
the Old Testament actually quite a bit
think about Balaam or Balaam when he is
going down the path and the dog he's on
the donkeys with the donkey and the
donkey starts to talk this is a
representation I believe of a priest a
ham or a coal mare which is Balaam but
bay liam is the bad priest and that
donkey is an exact representation of the
fact that you usually use the head of
the donkey specifically which is what
the donkey is using right he's talking
to Balaam and so this looks like a this
tradition looks like a fulfillment or
they're using Isaiah 1:3 as a
fulfillment of Scripture not just for
setting up the holy of holy scene but to
basically say hey high priests you are
the asses so to speak you are the hum or
not the Comair and you don't know Christ
you don't know God so that's really a
very interesting take and it looks very
likely there's several historic
archaeological finds that have that
verbiage in that wordplay in Hebrew now
we get to the shepherds and I'm gonna
hold that off until the next episode
because I want to match that up with the
the Magi and talk about those visits so
my point in this episode and really all
of these episodes
is trying to get an understanding of the
environment that Christ is being born
into that Jesus is being born into and
where Joseph and Mary and Zacharias and
Sarah and those that are with them
theologically those that are looking for
the Son of God what they must be
thinking at this time and how they as a
minority a small group within this
strong theocratic organization and in
society are going to try and turn
everything on its head and bring back
the older ways the true ways the ways
and the doctrine that Lehi taught while
he was in Jerusalem I'll talk to you
next time
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.